Miguel Bello
Director
Ricardo Lapeira
Foresight & Ethics Lead
Daniela Montenegro
Design Researcher
Mauricio Franco
Researcher & Visual Designer
Juan Sebastián Sánchez
Strategic Designer
Partners
Frontier Tech Hub, UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Year
2025
Services
Mapping Dynamics of Change; Foresight and Future Visions; Strategic Direction for Action
The global technological debate tends to focus on narratives of high hype and quick returns, leaving out technologies with great social, territorial and ecological value. The challenge was to identify these underhyped technologies and make strategic recommendations—based on foresight and evidence—so that public, private and community actors can explore, finance and adopt them fairly.
We combine research and technological curation with strategic foresight. To do this, we define technological selection criteria based on ‘attention’ (who is watching and why) and ‘potential’ (systemic and territorial impact).
With this approach, we studied 142 technologies with the potential to impact post-development at an international level.
Our ‘underhyped’ technologies challenge dominant narratives of innovation. Despite their potential to strengthen community resilience, ecological balance, and locally-based solutions, they receive little attention because they do not fit into traditional funding models or challenge assumptions about ‘progress.’
We reframe attention (who is looking, why, who benefits) and potential (the capacity to create long-term systemic impact, based on local priorities) to value technologies that expand the realm of possibility.
1) Data sovereignty and security
Move away from data extractivism and treat data as a common good. Communities decide what is collected, who has access to it and for what purpose, with decentralised infrastructure and security policies that prevent surveillance and misuse.
2) Community-centred economies and business models
Prevent technology from reproducing extractive dynamics. Promote local ownership and operation, circular economies and alternative finance that keep value in the territory.
3) Governance, social capabilities, and open technologies
Adoption depends less on the Technology Readiness Level and more on the social stack: bioregional governance, training, and community-controlled open source. It is about technological autonomy and peer learning.
4) Legal and ethical protection for implementation
Move from technology as private property to common good. Prevent monopolies, biopiracy and surveillance, and ensure human and environmental rights through proactive regulation and social participation.
5) Pluriversal research and community innovation ecosystems
Overcoming the ‘top-down’ approach. Researching and designing with communities, integrating indigenous, local and scientific knowledge, prioritising resilience, agroecology, water and restoration.
01
We explored a database of 142 technologies and filtered them by attention and potential with a post-developmental focus.
02
We compare with technical and territorial references to refine assumptions and biases.
03
We designed four scenarios that reveal plausible paths and critical risks.
04
Strategic and practical framework for integrating these technologies into international cooperation ecosystems.
01
02
Innovation from the margins; translocal cooperation and digital commons
03
04
Centralised deployments geared towards control; local autonomy at risk.
“The technology that matters is the one that promotes autonomy and cares for life.”
Discussions, workshops, and support for mapping systems, activating secure pilots, and setting up learning loops with our post-development approach.
This project was co-created by members of our Pluriversa Community:
Director
Foresight & Ethics Lead
Design Researcher
Researcher & Visual Designer
Strategic Designer
We would also like to extend our gratitude to our partners and teammates: